Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma.

Thoracolumbar spine trauma can result in potentially life-threatening consequences and requires careful management to ensure good outcomes. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the anatomy, diagnostic tools, non-operative, and operative treatments important when addressing thoracolumbar trauma.

Subaxial spine trauma: radiological approach and practical implications.

The cervical spine is part of the axial skeleton and is responsible for protecting vital structures, such as the spinal cord and the vertebral arteries and veins. Traumatic injury to the cervical spine occurs in approximately 3% of blunt trauma injuries, and approximately 80% are below the level of C2. The AO Spine society divides the spine into four segments: the upper cervical spine (C0-C2), subaxial spine (C3-C7), thoracolumbar spine, and sacral spine. Various classifications have been proposed for the subaxial segment since that of Allen and Ferguson in 1982; however, none is universally accepted, and treatment remains controversial. The complex anatomy and biomechanics of the subaxial spine and the lack of a widely accepted classification system make these injuries difficult to evaluate on imaging. The Subaxial Injury Classification System (SLIC) uses fracture morphology, the integrity of discoligamentous complex, and neurological status to score the patient and determine between operative and non-operative management; however, other factors may influence management, such as time for immobilisation, osteoporosis, surgeon's experience, and hospital circumstances. SLIC classifies fracture morphology in a crescent order of severity based on Allen and Ferguson's classification. Compression fractures are the simpler ones, while both distraction injuries and translation/rotation are severe injuries, which are always associated with some degree of discoligamentous complex (DLC) injury. This article will review the indications for imaging, the basis of the SLIC classification, the different types of fracture morphology, evaluation of the DLC, and other features important in decision making in subaxial spine trauma.

Factors Associated With Functional Impairment After Pediatric Injury.

Importance: Short- and long-term functional impairment after pediatric injury may be more sensitive for measuring quality of care compared with mortality alone. The characteristics of injured children and adolescents who are at the highest risk for functional impairment are unknown. Objective: To evaluate categories of injuries associated with higher prevalence of impaired functional status at hospital discharge among children and adolescents and to estimate the number of those with injuries in these categories who received treatment at pediatric trauma centers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study (Assessment of Functional Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life After Pediatric Trauma) included children and adolescents younger than 15 years who were hospitalized with at least 1 serious injury at 1 of 7 level 1 pediatric trauma centers from March 2018 to February 2020. Exposure: At least 1 serious injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale score, ≥3 [scores range from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating more severe injury]) classified into 9 categories based on the body region injured and the presence of a severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score <9 or Glasgow Coma Scale motor score <5). Main Outcomes and Measures: New domain morbidity defined as a 2 points or more change in any of 6 domains (mental status, sensory, communication, motor function, feeding, and respiratory) measured using the Functional Status Scale (FSS) (scores range from 1 [normal] to 5 [very severe dysfunction] for each domain) in each injury category at hospital discharge. The estimated prevalence of impairment associated with each injury category was assessed in the population of seriously injured children and adolescents treated at participating sites. Results: This study included a sample of 427 injured children and adolescents (271 [63.5%] male; median age, 7.2 years [interquartile range, 2.5-11.7 years]), 74 (17.3%) of whom had new FSS domain morbidity at discharge. The proportion of new FSS domain morbidity was highest among those with multiple injured body regions and severe head injury (20 of 24 [83.3%]) and lowest among those with an isolated head injury of mild or moderate severity (1 of 84 [1.2%]). After adjusting for oversampling of specific injuries in the study sample, 749 of 5195 seriously injured children and adolescents (14.4%) were estimated to have functional impairment at hospital discharge. Children and adolescents with extremity injuries (302 of 749 [40.3%]) and those with severe traumatic brain injuries (258 of 749 [34.4%]) comprised the largest proportions of those estimated to have impairment at discharge. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, most injured children and adolescents returned to baseline functional status by hospital discharge. These findings suggest that functional status assessments can be limited to cohorts of injured children and adolescents at the highest risk for impairment.

Clinical relevance and validity of TLICS system for thoracolumbar spine injury.

In order to enhance the reliability of the application to clinical practice of the TLICS classification, we retrospectively reviewed the patients with thoracolumbar spine injuries who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and analyzed the validity of the TLICS classification and the necessity of MRI. We enrolled 328 patients with thoracolumbar spine injury who underwent MRI. All patients were classified into conservative and operative treatment groups. The TLICS score of each group was analyzed and the degree of consistent with the recommended treatment through the TLICS classification was examined. Of the total 328 patients, 138 patients were treated conservatively and 190 patients were treated by surgery. Of the 138 patients who underwent conservative treatment, 131 patients (94.9%) had a TLICS score of 4 points or less, and matched with the recommendation score for conservative treatment according to the TLICS classification (match rate 94.9%, 131/138). Of the 190 patients who underwent operative treatment, 160 patients (84.2%) had a TLICS score of 4 points or more (match rate 84.2%, 160/190). All of 30 mismatched patients with a TLICS score of 3 points or less (15.8%) had stable burst fracture without neurological deficit. We retrospectively reviewed the validity of the TLICS classification for the injuries of the thoracolumbar spine, based on MRI in a large group of patients. Treatment with TLICS classification showed high validity, especially in conservative group, and MRI should be an essential diagnostic tool for accurate evaluation of posterior ligamentous complex injury.

Operative versus Non-Operative Management of Traumatic Thoracolumbar Injuries according to the AO Spine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System

Introduction The AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification (AOSTSIC) system has been proposed to better characterize injury morphologies and improve the classification of thoracolumbar (TL) spine trauma. However, the indications for surgical treatment according to the AOSTSIC system are still debated. Additionally, the proposed Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury Score (AOSIS) is quite complex, which may preclude its use in daily practice. The objective of this reviewis to discuss the AOSTSIC systemand its indications for initial nonoperative versus surgical management of acute TL spine trauma. Methods We analyzed the literature for each injury type (and subtype, when pertinent) according to the AOSTSIC system as well as their potential treatment options. Results Patients with AOSTSIC subtypes A0, A1, and A2 are neurologically intact in the vast majority of the cases and initially managed nonoperatively. The treatment of A3- and A4-subtype injuries (burst fractures) in neurologically-intact patients is still debated with great controversy, with initially nonoperative management being considered an option in select patients. Surgery is recommended when there are neurological deficits or failure of nonoperativemanagement,with the role of magnetic resonance findings in the Posterior Ligamentous Complex (PLC) evaluation still being considered controversial. Injuries classified as type B1 in neurologically-intact patients may be treated, initially, with nonoperative management, provided that there are no ligamentous injury and non-displacing fragments. Due to severe ligamentous injury, type-B and type-C injuries should be considered as unstable injuries that must be surgically treated, regardless of the neurological status of the patient. Conclusions Until further evidence, we provided an easy algorithm-based guide on the spinal trauma literature to help surgeons in the decision-making process for the treatment of TL spine injuries classified according to the new AOSTSIC system.

Epidemiology and Imaging Classification of Pediatric Cervical Spine Injuries: 12-Year Experience at a Level 1 Trauma Center.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiology and imaging characteristics of cervical spine injuries in children with blunt trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We conducted a retrospective review of the records of all patients 16 years old or younger with a diagnosis of cervical spine injury in the trauma registry of our level 1 trauma center between July 2006 and June 2018. RESULTS. Two hundred thirty-five patients were included in the study: 125 with subaxial cervical spine injuries, 87 with upper cervical spine injuries, and 23 with both subaxial and upper cervical spine injuries. The frequency of isolated upper cervical spine injuries was 73% in patients younger than 3 years old, 48% in patients 3-8 years old, and 29% in patients older than 8 years old. Seventy-one percent of occipital condyle fractures were avulsions, and 26% of dens fractures were avulsions. Type II dens fractures were found only in patients older than 8 years old. Type I and III dens fractures were almost exclusively in patients 8 years old or younger. Injuries classified as AOSpine types A, B, and C comprised 65.6%, 17.2%, and 17.2% of subaxial injuries, respectively. Despite similar mechanism of injury distribution across age groups, the frequency of AOSpine type A injuries in patients older than 8 years old (70.6%) was significantly higher compared with patients younger than 3 years old (40.0%) and those who were 3-8 years old (45.0%). The frequency of AOSpine type B injuries in patients younger than 3 years old (40.0%) was slightly higher than patients who were 3-8 years old (30.0%) and almost three times higher than in patients older than 8 years old (13.8%). CONCLUSION. Pediatric patients have high rates of upper cervical spine injuries, which tend to be distraction injuries that are frequently associated with avulsion fractures. Injury patterns in pediatric patients vary significantly by age, with patients younger than 3 years old being particularly prone to distraction type injuries.

Characterization of all-terrain vehicle-related thoracolumbar spine injury patterns in children using the AOSpine classification system.

PURPOSE: To evaluate thoracolumbar spine injury patterns, demographics, and clinical characteristics in pediatric patients following all-terrain vehicle-related trauma. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients 0-17 years old admitted to a level I trauma center following an ATV-related incident from 2004 to 2013 was performed. Thoracolumbar spine injury patterns, accident mechanism, driver/passenger status, and demographic and clinical data were compared between patients with and without a spine injury. RESULTS: Of 456 pediatric patients involved in ATV-related trauma, 36 sustained one or more thoracolumbar spine injuries (7.9%). These patients tended to be older, taller, heavier, and had a higher BMI. ATV rollover was the major statistically significant mechanism of injury to cause spine fractures (61%). Patients with spine injuries had twice the hospital length of stay compared with those without (4 days vs. 2 days, P = 0.003). Nonstructural spine injuries (A0) were the most common type of injury (49.1%), followed by wedge-compression fractures (A1) (41.1%). In patients with a thoracolumbar spine injury, there was a mean of 3.11 spine injuries per child. Four (10%) patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures also sustained a cervical spine fracture. CONCLUSION: Once a thoracolumbar spine injury has been detected in a patient, the entire spinal column should be scrutinized because there is a high likelihood for additional injuries throughout the spine. Younger pediatric patients (≤ 8 years old) exhibit a spine fracture pattern distinct from that of older children who have a mature osseous-ligamentous complex.

The Reliability of the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Classification System in Children: Results of a Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the new AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system is reliable and reproducible when applied to the pediatric population. METHODS: Nine POSNA (Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America) member surgeons were sent educational videos and schematic papers describing the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system. The material also contained magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography imaging of 25 pediatric patients with thoracolumbar spine injuries organized into cases to review and classify. The evaluators classified injuries into 3 primary categories: A, B, and C. Interobserver reliability was assessed for the initial reading by Fleiss kappa coefficient (kF) along with 95% confidence interval (CI). For A and B type injuries, subclassification was conducted including A0 to A4 and B1 to B2 subtypes. Interobserver reliability across subclasses was assessed using Krippendorff alpha (αk) along with bootstrapped 95% CI. Imaging was reviewed a second time by all evaluators ~1 month later. All imaging was blinded and randomized. Intraobserver reproducibility was assessed for the primary classifications using Fleiss kappa and subclassification reproducibility was assessed by Krippendorff alpha (αk) along with 95% CI. Interpretations for reliability estimates were based on Landis and Koch (1977): 0 to 0.2, slight; 0.2 to 0.4, fair; 0.4 to 0.6, moderate; 0.6 to 0.8, substantial; and >0.8, almost perfect agreement. RESULTS: Twenty-five cases were read for a total of 225 initial and 225 repeated evaluations. Adjusted interobserver reliability was almost perfect (kF=0.82; CI, 0.77-0.87) across all raters. Subclassification reliability was substantial (αK=0.79; CI, 0.62-0.90). Adjusted intraobserver reproducibility was almost perfect (kF=0.81; CI, 0.71-0.90) for both primary classifications and for subclassifications (αk=0.81; CI, 0.73-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: The reliability for the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury slassification System was high amongst POSNA surgeons when applied to pediatric patients. Given a lack of a uniform classification in the pediatric population, the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system has the potential to be used as the first universal spine fracture classification in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Reliability of the New AOSpine Classification System for Upper Cervical Traumatic Injuries.

BACKGROUND: The new AOSpine Upper Cervical Classification System (UCCS) was recently proposed by the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Trauma team to standardize the treatment of upper cervical traumatic injuries (UCI). In this context, evaluating its reliability is paramount prior to clinical use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of the new AOSpine UCCS. METHODS: A total of 32 patients with UCI treated either nonoperatively or with surgery by one of the authors were included in the study. Injuries were classified based on the new AO UCCS according to site and injury type using computed tomography scan images in 3 planes by 8 researchers at 2 different times, with a minimum interval of 4 wk between assessments. Intra- and interobserver reliability was assessed using the kappa index (K). Treatment options suggested by the evaluators were also assessed. RESULTS: Intraobserver agreement for sites ranged from 0.830 to 0.999, 0.691 to 0.983 for types, and 0.679 to 0.982 for the recommended treatment. Interobserver analysis at the first assessment was 0.862 for injury sites, 0.660 for types, and 0.585 for the treatment, and at the second assessment, it was 0.883 for injury sites, 0.603 for types, and 0.580 for the treatment. These results correspond to a high level of agreement of answers for the site and type analysis and a moderate agreement for the recommended treatment. CONCLUSION: This study reported an acceptable reproducibility of the new AO UCCS and safety in recommending the treatment. Further clinical studies with a larger patient sample, multicenter and international, are necessary to sustain the universal and homogeneity quality of the new AO UCCS.

Imaging of cervical spine traumas.

Spinal traumas represent a significant proportion of muscle-skeletal injuries worldwide. Spinal injuries involve a complex structure with components having different traumatic susceptibility and variable healing capabilities. The interaction of numerous variables at time of trauma creates a great variety of lesions which makes challenging the creation and comparison of homogeneous groups, with difficulties in classifying spinal lesions, in assessing their instability, and in defining the indication and outcome of different treatment strategies. The evolution of concepts on instability has accompanied that of traumas classification schemes and treatment strategies. The assessment of instability in a spinal injury is actually crucial in front of newer surgical techniques and hardwares. Despite a long history of attempts to classify spinal traumas, it remains some degree of controversy in describing imaging data and a wide variety of treatment strategies. Acute cervical spine injuries affect from 1.9% to 4.6% of subjects reporting a blunt trauma, and up to 5.9% of multiple-injured patients. Most of spinal cord injuries are a consequence of unstable fractures of the cervical spine. An accurate and early diagnosis is mandatory to prevent neurological damage in unstable fractures. Classic and newer classifications are primarily based on features identifiable by using conventional imaging and CT scan, which are the most available modalities at most trauma centers. Even though multidetector-CT remains superior in assessing with high accuracy bone injuries, MRI is the most sensitive modality for detecting soft tissues injuries and spinal cord damage.

Tectorial membrane injury in adult and pediatric trauma patients: a retrospective review and proposed classification scheme.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Traumatic tectorial membrane injuries have different radiologic presentations in adult versus pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to identify and classify the different types of tectorial membrane injuries that occur in the adult and pediatric populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who suffered tectorial membrane injury were identified retrospectively using the keywords 'tectorial membrane," "craniocervical ligament tear/injury," and "atlanto-occipital dissociation" included in radiology reports between 2012 and 2018 using Nuance mPower software. All relevant imaging studies were reviewed by two certificates of additional qualification-certified neuroradiologists. Detailed descriptions of injuries were recorded along with any relevant additional findings, including clinical history. RESULTS: Ten adults and six pediatric patients were identified with acute traumatic injuries of the tectorial membrane. Ninety percent of the adult patients sustained complete disruptions inferior to the clivus, or subclival, with 22% of tears at the level of the basion and 78% at the level of the odontoid tip. In contrast, 83% of pediatric patients suffered a stripping injury of the tectorial membrane located posterior to the clivus, or retroclival. Stretch injuries of the tectorial membrane were identified in 10% of adults and 17% of pediatric patients. The juvenile-type injury, which causes retroclival epidural hematoma, was determined to preferentially occur in patients less than or equal to 14 years of age with a high level of statistical significance (p value = 0.0014). CONCLUSIONS: A classification system for tectorial membrane injuries is proposed based on this data: type 1-retroclival stripping injury (more common in pediatric patients); type 2a-subclival disruption at the basion and type 2b-subclival disruption at the odontoid (both more common in adult patients); and type 3-thinning of the tectorial membrane.

Comparison of the AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system and the Allen classification.

The AOSpine group has launched a new subaxial cervical spine injury system (AOSCIS) based on morphology. The objective of this study was to use the AOSCIS and compare it to the widely used Allen classification (AC) based on mechanics for subaxial cervical spine injury. Twenty-two consecutive patients with subaxial cervical spine injury who received posterior cervical fixation in our hospital were included in this study. Medical records were evaluated retrospectively. The evaluated factors were as follows: preoperative ASIA impaired scale (AIS), AOSCIS, AC, and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). There was AIS A in nine patients, AIS C in four patients, AIS D in four patients, and AIS E in five patients. Two patients with AOSCIS B2 were classified as AC DF1. Two AOSCIS F3 patients were classified as AC CE1. Eighteen AOSCIS C patients were classified into multiple categories: five as AC DF2, three as DF3, one as CF4, one as CF5, four as DE2, three as CE3 + DE1, and one as CE3 + VC2. All of the AOSCIS A0 (F) or B patients were classified as AC stage 1, and all of the AOSCIS C patients were classified as AC stage 2 and higher (P < 0.05). All of six patients with DISH were classified as AOSCIS C and CE3, DE2, or DF3. AOSCIS and AC are correlated. Conducting an evaluation using both systems helps us to better comprehend subaxial cervical spine injuries.

AOSpine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System: The Relationship Between Injury Morphology, Admission Injury Severity, and Long-Term Neurologic Outcome.

OBJECTIVE: The AOSpine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System was introduced to improve communication, clinical management, and research. Here, the system was studied in relation to injury severity along with admission and long term neurologic follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in subaxial cervical spine injury patients. Morphology was classified using the AOSpine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System. Six major morphology subtypes were selected for analysis. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor and Abbreviated Injury Severity (AIS) scores were recorded at admission and at follow-up >6 months. Admission intramedullary lesion length (IMLL) on MRI was recorded. RESULTS: In all, 82 patients met criteria for analysis. The mean follow-up time was 11 months (range, 6-33 months). The were 36 patients with morphology subtypes A0, 4 with A1/A2, 9 with A3/A4, 8 with B2, 11 with B3, and 14 with C. The A1/2 subtype had the least severe injuries on admission. The C and A3/A4 subtypes had the most severe injuries. The subtype C had the lowest ASIA Motor Score (AMS) and second highest percentage of complete injuries. A3/A4 patients had the highest percentage of complete injuries on admission. At follow-up, A3/A4 patients had the lowest AMS, and 33% of patients continued to have complete injuries. C subtype injuries all converted to AIS incomplete injuries on follow-up (P = 0.04). IMLL was found to be significantly different compared across multiple morphologic subtypes. Surgical management for each morphology subtype was reported. CONCLUSION: The AOSpine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System successfully associated injury morphology with IMLL along with admission and long-term neurologic function and recovery.

Injuries to the Rigid Spine: What the Spine Surgeon Wants to Know.

The biomechanical stability of the spine is altered in patients with a rigid spine, rendering it vulnerable to fracture even from relatively minor impact. The rigid spine entities are ankylosing spondylitis (AS), diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, degenerative spondylosis, and a surgically fused spine. The most common mechanism of injury resulting in fracture is hyperextension, which often leads to unstable injury in patients with a rigid spine per the recent AOSpine classification system. Due to the increased risk of spinal fractures in this population, performing a spine CT is the first step when a patient with a rigid spine presents with new back pain or suspected spinal trauma. In addition, there should be a low threshold for performing a non-contrast-enhanced spine MRI in patients with a rigid spine, especially those with AS who may have an occult fracture, epidural hematoma, or spinal cord injury. Unfortunately, owing to insufficient imaging and an unfamiliarity with fracture patterns in the setting of a rigid spine, fracture diagnosis is often delayed, leading to significant morbidity and even death. The radiologist's role is to recognize the imaging features of a rigid spine, identify any fractures at CT and MRI, and fully characterize the extent of injury. Reasons for surgical intervention include neurologic deficit or concern for deterioration, an unstable fracture, or the presence of an epidural hematoma. By understanding the imaging features of various rigid spine conditions and vigilantly examining images for occult fractures, the radiologist can avoid a missed or delayed diagnosis of an injured rigid spine. ©RSNA, 2019.

Reliability of Allen Ferguson classification versus subaxial injury classification and severity scale for subaxial cervical spine injuries: a psychometrics study.

STUDY DESIGN: A psychometrics study. OBJECTIVES: To determine intra and inter-observer reliability of Allen Ferguson system (AF) and sub-axial injury classification and severity scale (SLIC), two sub axial cervical spine injury (SACI) classification systems. SETTING: Online multi-national study METHODS: Clinico-radiological data of 34 random patients with traumatic SACI were distributed as power point presentations to 13 spine surgeons of the Spine Trauma Study Group of ISCoS from seven different institutions. They were advised to classify patients using AF and SLIC systems. A reference guide of the two systems had been mailed to them earlier. After 6 weeks, the same cases were re-presented to them in a different order for classification using both systems. Intra and inter-observer reliability scores were calculated and analysed with Fleiss Kappa coefficient (k value) for both the systems and Intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC) for the SLIC. RESULTS: Allen Ferguson system displayed a uniformly moderate inter and intra-observer reliability. SLIC showed slight to fair inter-observer reliability and fair to substantial intra-observer reliability. AF mechanistic types showed better inter-observer reliability than the SLIC morphological types. Within SLIC, the total SLIC had the least inter-observer agreement and the SLIC neurology had the highest intra-observer agreement. CONCLUSION: This first external reliability study shows a better reliability for AF as compared to SLIC system. Among the SLIC variables, the DLC status and the total SLIC had least agreement. Low-reliability highlights the need for improving the existing classification systems or coming out with newer ones that consider limitations of the existing ones.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Classification of Injury.

QUESTION 1: Are there classification systems for fractures of the thoracolumbar spine that have been shown to be internally valid and reliable (ie, do these instruments provide consistent information between different care providers)? RECOMMENDATION 1: A classification scheme that uses readily available clinical data (eg, computed tomography scans with or without magnetic resonance imaging) to convey injury morphology, such as Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scale or the AO Spine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System, should be used to improve characterization of traumatic thoracolumbar injuries and communication among treating physicians. Strength of Recommendation: Grade B. QUESTION 2: In treating patients with thoracolumbar fractures, does employing a formally tested classification system for treatment decision-making affect clinical outcomes? RECOMMENDATION 2: There is insufficient evidence to recommend a universal classification system or severity score that will readily guide treatment of all injury types and thereby affect outcomes. Strength of Recommendation: Grade Insufficient The full version of the guideline can be reviewed at: https://www.cns.org/guideline-chapters/congress-neurological-surgeons-systematic-review-evidence-based-guidelines/chapter_2.

Predictors of Failure of Nonoperative Management Following Subaxial Spine Trauma and Creation of Modified Subaxial Injury Classification System.

BACKGROUND: Subaxial cervical spine injuries may be treated with either nonoperative stabilization or surgical fixation. The subaxial injury classification (SLIC) provides 1 method for suggesting the degree of necessity for surgery. In the current study, we examined if the SLIC score, or other preoperative metrics, can predict failure of nonoperative management. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review to identify patients who presented with acute, nonpenetrating, subaxial cervical spine injury within our health system between 2007 and 2016. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, injuries, and treatments were collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine potential predictors of failure of nonoperative management. RESULTS: During the study period, 40 patients met the inclusion criteria. A small subset of patients failed nonoperative management (n = 5, 12.5%). The mean SLIC score was 3.9 ± 1.9; however, 14 (35%) patients had scores >4. Neither total SLIC score (P = 0.68) nor SLIC subscores (morphology [P = 0.96], discoligamentous complex [P = 0.83], neurologic status [P = 0.60]) predicted failure of nonoperative treatment. Time to evaluation/treatment did predict failure of nonoperative management. Evaluation within 8 hours of injury was a negative predictor of failure (odds ratio = 0.03, P = 0.001) and evaluation 24 hours or more after injury was a positive predictor of failure (odds ratio = 66.00, P < 0.001). We created a modified SLIC score on the basis of these findings, which significantly predicted failure of nonoperative management (P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Management of subaxial spine injuries is complex. In our cohort, SLIC scoring did not adequately predict odds of failure of nonoperative management. Time to evaluation, however, did. We created a modified SLIC score that significantly predicted failure of nonoperative management.

Caracterización del trauma raquimedular en el Servicio de Neurocirugía, Guantánamo 2013-2018 / Caracterização do trauma raquimedular no Serviço de Neurocirurgia, Guantanamo 2013-2018 / Characterization of spinal cord trauma in the Neurosurgery Service, Guantanamo 2013-2018

Introducción: en el Hospital General Docente Dr Agostinho Neto no se ha caracterizado el trauma raquimedular. Objetivo: caracterizar el trauma raquimedular en el Servicio de Neurocirugía del Hospital General Docente Dr Agostinho Neto durante los años 2013-2018. Método: se realizó un estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo y longitudinal. La población se constituyó por 230 pacientes, de los que se escogió una muestra aleatoria (n=92). Se estudiaron las siguientes variables: edad, sexo, tiempo entre el trauma y la atención médica especializada, tipo de lesión, causas del trauma. Resultados: los pacientes fueron sobre todo hombres (69,6 por ciento), tenían entre 39 y 48 años (23,9 por ciento), fracturas vertebrales (59,8 por ciento), sobrevivió el 95,7 por ciento y el 56,5 por ciento fue atendido en las primeras 6 horas postrauma. Conclusiones: los traumas raquimedulares afectan a pacientes en la etapa productiva de la vida, lo que muestra la pertinencia social de su estudio(AU)

Introduction: in the General Teaching Hospital Dr Agostinho Neto has not been characterized by spinal cord trauma. Objective: to characterize spinal cord trauma in the Neurosurgery Service of the General Teaching Hospital Dr Agostinho Neto during the years 2013- 2018. Method: a descriptive, retrospective and longitudinal study was carried out. The population consisted of 230 patients, from which a random sample was chosen (n=92). The following variables were studied: age, sex, time between trauma and specialized medical care, type of injury, causes of trauma. Results: the patients were mostly men (69.6per cent), were between 39 and 48 years (23.9per cent), vertebral fractures (59.8per cent), survived 95.7per cent and 56.5per cent were attended in the first 6 hours post trauma. Conclusions: spinal cord traumas affect patients in the productive stage of life, which shows the social relevance of their study(AU)

Introdução: no Hospital Geral de Ensino Dr Agostinho Neto não se caracterizou por trauma medular. Objetivo: caracterizar o trauma medular no Serviço de Neurocirurgia do Hospital Geral de Ensino Dr Agostinho Neto durante os anos 2013-2018. Método: estudo descritivo, retrospectivo e longitudinal. A população foi composta por 230 pacientes, dos quais foi escolhida uma amostra aleatória (n=92). Foram estudadas as seguintes variáveis: idade, sexo, tempo entre trauma e atendimento médico especializado, tipo de lesão, causas do trauma. Resultados: os pacientes eram majoritariamente homens (69,6 por cento), tinham entre 39 e 48 anos (23,9 por cento), fraturas vertebrais (59,8 por cento), sobreviveram 95,7per cent e 56,5per cent foram compareceu nas primeiras 6 horas pós-trauma. Conclusões: os traumas da medula espinhal afetam os pacientes na fase produtiva da vida, o que mostra a relevância social de seu estudo(AU)